Skip Navigation



International Journal of Lexicography Advance Access published online on July 26, 2006
International Journal of Lexicography, doi:10.1093/ijl/ecl015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/287    most recent
ecl015v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Álvarez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Gil, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original Papers

John Entick's and Ann Fisher's Dictionaries: An Eighteenth-Century Case of (Cons)Piracy?

Alicia Rodríguez-Álvarez 1 * and María Esther Rodríguez-Gil 1 *

1 Departamento de Filología Moderna, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Alicia Rodríguez-Álvarez, E-mail: arodriguez{at}dfm.ulpgc.es
María Esther Rodríguez-Gil, E-mail: mariarodgil{at}telefonica.net


  Abstract

In the eighteenth century a combination of economic and social circumstances gave rise to a debate over the notions of authorship and originality in London. The growing diffusion of printed works caused an increasing popularity of certain authors who were on the way to professionalization. An accurate attribution of works became thus a key point in their careers and incomes, but also in those of influential booksellers who, zealous of their business, used their power to protect their investment. This zeal, notwithstanding, did not prevent authors from copying, using and imitating other authors without acknowledging their sources. Such a practice caused problems of authorship, as in the case of the dictionaries written by Entick, The New Spelling Dictionary (1765), and by Fisher, An Accurate New Spelling Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language (17732). In a small set of letters written by Ann Fisher and some unpublished draft copies of the preface to her dictionary, she defends herself against a charge of piracy in which Entick's dictionary was involved. In these documents she not only denounces the falsity of these accusations but also tackles the question of authorship/originality in the production of dictionaries. The aim of this paper is to check Fisher's line of defence by, first, comparing both dictionaries and, second, briefly revising the eighteenth-century lexicographers’ practice of using an array of sources to devise their dictionaries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.