Skip Navigation

International Journal of Lexicography 2005 18(1):47-75; doi:10.1093/ijl/eci003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Schryver, G.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Concurrent Over- and Under-treatment in Dictionaries – The Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal as a Case in Point*

Gilles-Maurice de Schryver

Department of African Languages and Cultures, Ghent University and Department of African Languages, University of Pretoria gillesmaurice.deschryver{at}UGent.be

Consistency all the way through a reference work is a crucial yet often overlooked aspect in lexicography. This is especially true for multi-volume dictionary projects. In this contribution it is shown how a multidimensional lexicographic Ruler can be used to monitor over- and/or under-treatment in terms of number and length of dictionary articles. Since inconsistencies are often directly related to either speeding up or slowing down, acceleration in dictionary projects is the topic of section 1. Rulers as measurement and prediction instruments are discussed in section 2, while such instruments are presented for isiNdebele, English and Afrikaans in sections 3, 4 and 5 respectively. As a case study, the Woordeboek van die Afrikaanse Taal (WAT) is then analysed in depth, focusing on average article length in section 6, concurrent over- and under-treatment in section 7, and the last volume published so far in section 8. From this study follows that, contrary to what is generally accepted, WAT is not only not being compiled faster than ever, but also that – in order for the dictionary to be balanced – over half the items are missing from the last volume. The main argument of this article is that the latter type of skewing may be signalled by concurrent over- and under-treatment, a kind of treatment that masks inconsistencies. Section 9, finally, sums up and looks ahead.



An earlier version of this article was presented at the 8th International Conference of Afrilex, held in Windhoek, Namibia, 7–9 July 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J LexicographyHome page
J. Coleman and S. Ogilvie
Forensic Dictionary Analysis: Principles and Practice
Int J Lexicography, March 1, 2009; 22(1): 1 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.