Skip Navigation



International Journal of Lexicography Advance Access published online on August 20, 2009

International Journal of Lexicography, doi:10.1093/ijl/ecp023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keizer, E.
Right arrow Articles by Honselaar, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A Functional Discourse Grammar Account of Set Nouns in Dutch and its Implications for Lexicography

Evelien Keizer

University of Amsterdam/ACLC (m.e.keizer{at}uva.nl)

Wim Honselaar

University of Amsterdam/ACLC (w.j.j.honselaar{at}uva.nl)


   Abstract

This paper1 examines the semantic and syntactic behavior of Dutch S-nouns (e.g. echtpaar, ‘married couple’, tweetal ‘twosome, couple’ and stel ‘couple’), a particular subset of what are generally known as ‘set’ (or ‘collection’) nouns. Using the theoretical framework of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG; Hengeveld and Mackenzie 2008), it more particularly addresses the question which information needs to be provided in the lexicon, as well as in other components of the grammar model, to ensure that only semantically and syntactically well-formed constructions are produced. After a brief introduction to the relevant aspects of FDG, the paper focuses on two specific issues: the (restrictions on) possible combinations of S-nouns and (adjectival) modifiers and the distinctive semantic, syntactic and distributional behavior of Dutch S-nouns (in particular with regard to number concord). It is concluded that for the theory of FDG to be as restrictive as required and as flexible as possible, constraining (subclassifying) information is required in the lexical entry of all nominals; on the basis of the evidence provided in this paper, it is felt that there is no need to include matching information on adjectival lexemes. Finally, it is argued that the detailed description and analysis of S-nouns presented in this paper should form the basis of their treatment in Dutch dictionaries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.