Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LA VECCHIA, C.
Right arrow Articles by FRANCESCHI, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LA VECCHIA, C.
Right arrow Articles by FRANCESCHI, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Dietary Indicators of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer

CARLO LA VECCHIA*,**, EVA NEGRI*, BARBARA D'AVANZO*, PETER BOYLE{dagger} and SILVIA FRANCESCHI{ddagger}

*Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’ Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano, Italy.
**Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.
{dagger}The International Agency for Research on Cancer 69372 Lyon, France.
{ddagger}Aviano Cancer Centre 33081 Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.

The relationship between frequency of consumption of a selected number of indicator foods and oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk was analysed in a case-control study conducted in Northern Italy on 105 cases of oral and pharyngeal cancer and 1169 controls in hospital for acute, non-neoplastic or digestive diseases. Besides significant and strong direct associations with tobacco (relative risk, RR = 11.0 for current versus never smokers) and alcohol (RR = 5.8 for upper versus lower consumption tertile), consumption of six food items (milk, meat, cheese, carrots, green vegetables and fruit) were inversely and significantly related to oral and pharyngeal cancer risk. The strongest protection was apparently related to frequent fruit consumption, with RRs of 0.8 and 0.2 in the two highest tertiles. Allowance for major potential confounding factors, including tobacco, alcohol and social class indicators explained only part of the dietary correlates observed. The two items remaining significant after multivariate analysis were fruit (RR = 0.3 for the upper tertile) and alcohol (RR = 3.8 for the upper tertile). The associations observed may simply reflect a generally poorer nutritional status in the cases, although the observation that fruit consumption appears to be a particularly important protective factor against oropharyngeal cencer is of potential interest, in terms of aetiological clues and preventive implications.

Revised 1 July 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Pavia, C. Pileggi, C. G. Nobile, and I. F Angelillo
Association between fruit and vegetable consumption and oral cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2006; 83(5): 1126 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. J. Weinstein, G. Gridley, L. C. Harty, S. R. Diehl, L. M. Brown, D. M. Winn, E. Bravo-Otero, and R. B. Hayes
Folate Intake, Serum Homocysteine and Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T Genotype Are Not Associated with Oral Cancer Risk in Puerto Rico
J. Nutr., April 1, 2002; 132(4): 762 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.