Skip Navigation

International Journal of Lexicography 2004 17(2):155-160; doi:10.1093/ijl/17.2.155
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Campenhoudt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

RÉSEAU SÉMANTIQUE ET APPROCHE COMPONENTIELLE DES BASES DE DONNÉES LEXICALES MULTILINGUES

Marc Van Campenhoudt1

1 Centre de recherche TERMISTI, Institut supérieur de traducteurs et interprètes (34, rue Joseph Hazard B-1180 Bruxelles) ( marc.van.campenhoudt{at}euronet.be )

The author posits that a componential approach seems, at the moment, more appropriate in specialized lexicography or in terminography than in general lexicography. Although the use of lattices has its merits, the author observes that trees appear to be more effective to find an equivalent in case of lexical gaps.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.